Is self-publishing faster and easier than traditional publishing?

Image by Pixabay: https://pixabay.com/photos/wind-rose-north-east-west-south-1209398/
(I chose this image as I think it represents all the myriad decisions an author has to make regarding their work.)

I recently corresponded with a newer author who was looking to self-publish her book-length memoir. The reason? She believed it would be faster and easier to get her book into the world if she went the self-publishing route. She informed me that she herself had worked as an editor, albeit some time ago, and so was pretty good at picking up grammar errors and the like. As she was also on her second draft, she believed it shouldn’t take very much effort to self-publish. She wanted to explore the possibility of working with me in order to achieve this.

 As this is a fairly common situation to authors, I thought it might be helpful to share my abbreviated reply to her here.

The process of self-publishing a book is not necessarily faster. When an author is published by a traditional publisher, the publishing company manages all of the editing, proofreading, layout, book cover design, etc. (the marketing is now something the author is expected to do or energetically contribute to in most cases, unless one is a very big name!). With self-publishing, the author is in charge of all of this, as well as the writing. That doesn’t mean it’s not do-able, but to do it well usually requires an outlay of time and money (including time to figure out what absolutely has to be done and what you might be able to cut corners on). Generally speaking, the more professional the book appears, the better its chances are. But it also depends on who the expected readership is.

In terms of editing, it’s not unusual for a first book to go through two or more rounds of developmental editing (“big-picture” editing for structure, plot, pacing and so on), before the book is edited for grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. (generally known as a copyedit). The book would then usually be formatted (often by the author, but there are book formatters who will do this for you) and proofread (a last check for errors, formatting inconsistencies and so on) before being uploaded onto Amazon (or your provider of choice, though Amazon is the biggest and most widely used). In between each round of editing, the author would need to check the file and make decisions about the manuscript. With a copyedit, these changes would mostly involve wording, but with a developmental/structural edit, they could involve whole chapters being moved around or, sometimes, reconsidering a plot thread.

Of course, not every author goes through all of these steps. Some authors undergo a developmental edit in order to strengthen their story and writing technique, but others rely heavily on beta readers or critique partners for story feedback. An author might then move onto either a copyedit or a sort of proof-edit (a proofread with extra attention paid to grammatical issues). For the authors who skip professional copyediting, they would usually try to do this on their own. For the authors who skip proofreading, but opt for a professional copyedit, they would usually spend extra time checking and double checking their formatting prior to publishing. I hope that makes sense?

While some copyeditors will pay attention to the plot and story while editing the writing itself, generally, editing the grammar is a separate step from editing the story.

I’m a developmental editor, so I focus primarily on the big picture of the story, not the grammar of a piece, though I sometimes point out typos or any egregious errors I discover while reading (and, of course, anything that impacts on the general “voice” of a piece, such as point-of-view and major tense issues). Because a story may change quite a lot after a developmental edit, there’s not a lot of point in correcting the grammar at the same time. In general nonfiction developmental editing, it’s more common to combine these functions (but this is different with creative writing).

Also, as a developmental editor, my approach is generally to point out any weaker areas in a story, explain what’s not working and why and then provide advice on how the author might address/strengthen these areas. In other words, I don’t make any changes to the story myself as I believe it’s up to the author to make their own creative decisions about their work. So, after I finish an edit, an author usually has a lot of rewriting to do!

Whew! Sorry, that’s a lot of information. I just think it’s important to lay that out as not everyone is aware of how much can be involved in self-publishing and in the editing process
.

As you can see from my reply to her, self-publishing can be just as complex a process as traditional publishing!

Are you a self-published author? If so, what was your experience of the publishing process?

Until next time,

Kendra

3 thoughts on “Is self-publishing faster and easier than traditional publishing?

  1. I would love to publish in the traditional way, especially because I am not good at the Marketing side of things.
    I have followed all the advices about hashtags and Social Media, but I barely get 10 views, let alone likes or re-tweets.
    Publishers and agencies already have an established network, so I definitely think the sale would be much smoother.

    BUT…. I have looked on many websites of agencies and publishers and the submission guidelines seem impossible to meet,
    And then there is this dreadful sentence:
    “Due to a great volume we cannot respond to everyone. You may assume that after 6 months we are not interested in publishing your work.”

    It is off putting and really sucks my motivation away.
    So, that’s why I try to make it on my own and it really is trial and error 😉

    Like

    • Hi Andrea, Thanks for reading my post. 🙂
      It is so disheartening to have to wait so long for a response from traditional publishers and literary agents, isn’t it? I guess when you take into account the response time of traditional publishers, self-publishing may be a little faster, though it is still a lot of work. I think many authors underestimate how much work actually goes into producing a self-published book.
      I completely understand why you prefer to go it on your own–self-publishing offers authors so much creative freedom! Still, the marketing side is really tough. I hope that you’ve managed to find a few readers who value your work. Getting a book out into the world is one of the best things about self-publishing.

      Like

  2. Pingback: New blog post on my editing website | Kendra Olson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.